Matilda est un moteur de recherche académique visant à améliorer l'accès aux données de références et citations souvent négligées dans la recherche. Il se
Nous avons tous eu l’occasion de croiser des « boîtes à livres ». Mais que sait-on de celles et ceux qui fréquentent ces boîtes et des usages qu’ils en font ?
L’outil Urbansimul National du Cerema est ouvert à tous les aux acteurs publics depuis décembre 2022. En ce début d’année, le téléchargement des données est venu complété les fonctionnalités de l’outil.
The sheer number of online services and social media platforms available to academics makes it possible to receive a constant stream of information about newly published research. However, much of …
22 résultats affichés Aleph Search Clear Lire la suite Alerti Lire la suite AMI EI Lire la suite Ask’n’Read Lire la suite CIKISI Lire la suite Coalition.ai Lire la suite Cogito Intelligence Platform (CIP) Lire la suite CorTexT Lire la suite Curebot Lire la suite Digimind Intelligence Lire la suite...
"As smartphones and tablets become increasingly prevalent, learners can seamlessly access a wealth of educational materials at their convenience, fostering a culture of continuous learning."
Using the h-index to assess individual researchers is not only unethical and unfair but also inaccurate and misleading. This index fails to offer a reliable measure of a researcher's impact based on their citation scores. Beyond statistical and conceptual considerations, authorship practices, especially in the case of multi-authored publications, give rise to significant problems that often go unnoticed. While some modifications of the h-index have been proposed to mitigate these weaknesses, the fundamental deficiencies persist. Most of these flaws have been effectively addressed by the c-score, a composite citation index. The c-score excludes self-citations, normalizes the number of citations by considering the number of authors in each paper, and takes into account first, single, and last authorship. This approach provides a more realistic measure of the impact of each individual researcher based on raw citations.
"eLearning courses can be hugely beneficial, but it’s also important to remember how the online world differs greatly from being sat in the same room as someone. It’s important that the eLearning course, and its structure, doesn’t fall victim to these common issues below, which are often the reason why eLearning fails."
OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to the established proprietary sources, the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the question naturally arises as to the trustworthiness of its data. In this empirical paper, we will study the reference and metadata coverage within each database and compare them with each other to help address this open question in bibliometrics. In our large-scale study, we demonstrate that, when restricted to a cleaned dataset of 16,788,282 recent publications shared by all three databases, OpenAlex has average reference numbers comparable to both Web of Science and Scopus. We also demonstrate that the comparison of other core metadata covered by OpenAlex shows mixed results, with OpenAlex capturing more ORCID identifiers, fewer abstracts and a similar number of Open Access information per article when compared to both Web of Science and Scopus.
L'ensemble des articles que je sauvegarde et lis dans Readwise. Tous ont un rapport avec l'IA mais beaucoup concernent le domaine de l'éducation également.
The sheer number of online services and social media platforms available to academics makes it possible to receive a constant stream of information about newly published research. However, much of …
Although the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has a substantial history as a research domain, never before has the rapid evolution of AI applications in education sparked such prominent public discourse. Given the already rapidly growing AIEd literature base in higher education, now is the time to ensure that the field has a solid research and conceptual grounding. This review of reviews is the first comprehensive meta review to explore the scope and nature of AIEd in higher education (AIHEd) research, by synthesising secondary research (e.g., systematic reviews), indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOHost, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect and ACM Digital Library, or captured through snowballing in OpenAlex, ResearchGate and Google Scholar. Reviews were included if they synthesised applications of AI solely in formal higher or continuing education, were published in English between 2018 and July 2023, were journal articles or full conference papers, and if they had a method section 66 publications were included for data extraction and synthesis in EPPI Reviewer, which were predominantly systematic reviews (66.7%), published by authors from North America (27.3%), conducted in teams (89.4%) in mostly domestic-only collaborations (71.2%). Findings show that these reviews mostly focused on AIHEd generally (47.0%) or Profiling and Prediction (28.8%) as thematic foci, however key findings indicated a predominance of the use of Adaptive Systems and Personalisation in higher education. Research gaps identified suggest a need for greater ethical, methodological, and contextual considerations within future research, alongside interdisciplinary approaches to AIHEd application. Suggestions are provided to guide future primary and secondary research.
What does content curation mean? Content curation is the process of gathering, editing, and sharing valuable and relevant content from a variety of sources, tailored to a specific audience. It’s like being a museum curator but for online content!
What does content curation mean? Content curation is the process of gathering, editing, and sharing valuable and relevant content from a variety of sources, tailored to a specific audience. It’s like being a museum curator but for online content!
I cannot express how relieved I am to have found a company like TrustGeeks Hack Expert. Losing my Bitcoin wallet was a sad experience, both financially and emotionally. I had tried various methods and consulted numerous experts, but none of them could provide a solution. One of my schoolmates who had recovered her bitcoins referred me to TrustGeeks Hack Expert a team of experts. From the moment I reached out to them, their team displayed a hand of support. They understood the urgency of my situation and immediately began working on my case. Their advanced technology and expertise in the field of cryptocurrency recovery were evident throughout the entire process. Their attention to detail approach gave me confidence that I was in capable hands. They kept me informed at every step of the way, providing regular updates and explaining the progress made. To my absolute delight. TrustGeeks Hack Expert was successful in recovering my Bitcoin wallet. I cannot thank TrustGeeks Hack Expert enough for their outstanding services. Their expertise, and commitment to their clients is top . I highly recommend reaching out TrustGeeks Hack Expert has a positive impact they have had into my life. I will advise anyone who falls victim to consult and communicate with the honest hacker through Email: trustgeekshackexpert(At)fastservice . com Telegram User:@Trustgeekshackexpert $ WhatsApp +1(406)- 218- 6900
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
![Publishing Trend [1994 - 2022] | Notebook or My Personal Learning Network | Scoop.it](https://img.scoop.it/_j2D-9oVokHrrennq3mDDDl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9)
![Goodbye H-index, Welcome C-score [v3] | Preprints.org | Notebook or My Personal Learning Network | Scoop.it](https://img.scoop.it/8XwO1gtZojcxFRwfu43ioTl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9)
![[2401.16359] Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus | Notebook or My Personal Learning Network | Scoop.it](https://img.scoop.it/R3Nf-aV-zFCPDr3s1jV_-zl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9)
